CALVIN THOMAS, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
CALVIN THOMAS, PETITIONER,
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
112 So. 3d 696
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2013)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.
CLARK, MARSTILLER, and SWANSON, JJ„ concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Milton v. Julianna Milton, 113 So. 3d 1040 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013)…tempt for her willful violation of a time-sharing agreement between the parents. There is nothing that requires a trial court to hold a person in contempt; the court’s determination in this regard is reviewed for abuse of discretion. Nunes v. Nunes, 112 So. 3d 696 [*1041] (Fla. 4th DCA 2018). Given the record before us, we cannot say it was an abuse of discretion to not hold Mrs. Milton in contempt. See Cummings v. Cummings, 723 So. 2d 898, 899 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) (order of make-up time does not necessitate h…
-
Jeffers v. Therese Gail McLEARY, 118 So. 3d 287 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013)…e court did not address the best interest of the child at the hearing) (citations omitted). We note, however, that “[t]he better practice is for the trial court to thoroughly address the relevant considerations in its written order.” Nunes v. Nunes, 112 So. 3d 696, 702 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013). In this case, while the order is not fundamentally defective because it failed to include required findings, we must nevertheless reverse because the record is clear that the court failed to consider the Father’s evidence.…
-
Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp. v. Anderson, 241 So. 3d 221 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018)