ROBERT WILTON COX, JR., APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 2013-04-24
No. 2D12-5278
ALTENBERND, NORTHCUTT, and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.
113 So. 3d 71 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2013)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that the postconviction court erred by failing to attach record portions conclusively refuting the claim of proceeding to trial while incompetent.


Facts & Procedural History

The appellant claimed he was denied due process by being forced to trial while incompetent, alleging the trial court ordered an examination but took n…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Robert Wilton Cox, Jr., appeals the order summarily denying his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 in August 2012. We affirm without discussion the denial of all of the grounds of his motion except one.

In ground eight, Mr. Cox argued that he was denied due process when he was forced to proceed to trial while incompetent. He claimed that the trial court entered an order for a competency examination and an order appointing examiners, but that no further action occurred to resolve the issue before he was tried. He asserted that his lawyer was ineffective in this regard.

The posteonviction court did not attach to its order portions of the record refuting *72this claim. The record tends to support Mr. Cox’s factual allegations that an order for a competency examination is in the trial court record and that no further action was taken on the order. Accordingly, we reverse the postconviction court’s order on this claim. On remand, the court shall attach the portions of the record that conclusively refute ground eight or conduct an evidentiary hearing.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with directions.

ALTENBERND, NORTHCUTT, and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw