CITY OF MIAMI, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA; E. A. EVANS, CITY MANAGER AND MEMBER EX-OFFICIO OF THE MIAMI CITY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT BOARD, GEORGE SHAW, AS DIRECTOR OF FINANCE AND MEMBER EX-OFFICIO OF THE MIAMI CITY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT BOARD, AND J. HUKLE, H. V. CARLTON, R. F. HELKEN AND W. P. MOOTY, AS MEMBERS OF THE MIAMI CITY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT BOARD, APPELLANTS,
v.
LEON HALL, EVERETT KAY, PHILLIP HORNE, CHARLES RENEGAR AND JOHN DOWDA, APPELLEES
CITY OF MIAMI, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA; E. A. EVANS, CITY MANAGER AND MEMBER EX-OFFICIO OF THE MIAMI CITY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT BOARD, GEORGE SHAW, AS DIRECTOR OF FINANCE AND MEMBER EX-OFFICIO OF THE MIAMI CITY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT BOARD, AND J. HUKLE, H. V. CARLTON, R. F. HELKEN AND W. P. MOOTY, AS MEMBERS OF THE MIAMI CITY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT BOARD, APPELLANTS,
LEON HALL, EVERETT KAY, PHILLIP HORNE, CHARLES RENEGAR AND JOHN DOWDA, APPELLEES
105 So. 2d 499
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1958)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
The decree appealed from is affirmed. Except as to the provision for attorney fees, the affirmance is on the authority of the case of City of Miami v. Carter, Fla. 1958, 105 So.2d 5. We have considered the arguments relating to the allowance and amount of attorney’s fees, and also affirm that feature of the decree.
CARROLL, CHAS., C. J., and HORTON . and PEARSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
DeWitt C. Bailey v. Murrell, 175 So. 2d 533 (Fla. 1965)…urt of Appeal rejected this contention. In their petition for writ of certiorari, petitioners contend the decision of the District Court of Appeal conflicts with Jackson v. McGrath and City of Miami v. Carter, supra, and with City of Miami v. Hall, 105 So. 2d 499 (Fla.App. 3rd). Accepting the view of the District Court of Appeal that Ch. 185 has similar meaning and effect as to city policemen as does Ch. 175 to city firemen, it is appropriate that said cases relied upon by petitioners be examined to determi…
-
City OF Miami v. Gates, 592 So. 2d 749 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992)…the pension system. Count III involved the claim that, between 1958 and 1967, the city had used such funds for the payment of the judgments against it which were affirmed in City of Miami v. Carter, 105 So. 2d 5 (Fla.1958) and City of Miami v. Hall, 105 So. 2d 499 (Fla. 3d DCA 1958). Count IV contended that, within the preceding three years, the city had used these revenues to meet its statutory obligations to pay workmen’s compensation benefits. City of Miami v. Gates, 393 So. 2d 586, 587 (Fla. 3d DCA) (foo…
-
City OF Miami v. Gates, 393 So. 2d 586 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)…the pension system. Count III involved the claim that, between 1958 and 1967, the city had used such funds for the payment of the judgments against it which were affirmed in City of Miami v. Carter, 105 So. 2d 5 (Fla.1958) and City of Miami v. Hall, 105 So. 2d 499 (Fla. 3d DCA 1958).2 Count IV contended that, within the preceding three years, the city had used these revenues to meet its statutory obligations to pay workmen’s compensation benefits. After the denial of a motion to dismiss was affirmed in City o…
Authorities Cited
- The City OF Miami v. Carter, 105 So. 2d 5 (Fla. 1958)