JOHN WERTS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 2012-05-04
No. 2D11-4536
VILLANTI, KHOUZAM, and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.
113 So. 3d 859 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2012) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

John Werts appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm; however, as to his claim alleging the improper forfeiture of gain time, our affirmance is without prejudice to pursue his administrative remedies with the Florida Department of Corrections. If he is unsuccessful after exhausting those remedies, he may seek mandamus relief in the appropriate circuit court. See State v. Taylor, 738 So.2d 988, 989 n. 1 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999); Alexander v. State, 697 So.2d 1017, 1017 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997).

Affirmed.

VILLANTI, KHOUZAM, and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Croft v. State, 136 So. 3d 658 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013)
    …s presumptive parole release date, our affirmance is without prejudice to pursue his administrative remedies with the Florida Parole Commission. If he is unsuccessful, he may seek mandamus relief in the appropriate circuit court. See Werts v. State, 113 So. 3d 859 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012); Sullivan v. Fla. Parole Comm’n, 920 So. 2d 106 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006). Affirmed. CASANUEVA, VILLANTI, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw