ALEXANDER PHILIPPOU AND PETER PHILIPPOU, APPELLANTS,
v.
J.P. MORGAN MORTGAGE ACQUISITION CORPORATION, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 2013-03-01
No. 2D10-4771
WALLACE, CRENSHAW, and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.
113 So. 3d 975 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2013) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Alexander and Peter Philippou challenge a final summary judgment of foreclosure entered in favor of Chase Home Finance LLC, a nonparty. The plaintiff, J.P. Morgan Mortgage Acquisition Corporation (J.P. Morgan), confesses error relating to the entry of the final summary judgment and requests that the final judgment be reversed and this case remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.

Upon consideration of J.P. Morgan’s confession of error, we reverse the final summary judgment of foreclosure and remand this case to the trial court for further proceedings. See Verizzo v. Bank of N.Y., 28 So.3d 976, 978 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010); see also Beaumont v. Bank of N.Y. *976 Mellon, 81 So.3d 553, 554 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012).

Reversed and remanded.

WALLACE, CRENSHAW, and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Ludvick Ibanez v. 21ST Mortg. Corp., 207 So. 3d 901 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017)
    …ntiff,” the trial court never actually determined if this was the case. MGIC erroneously called itself the “Plaintiff’ in its motion, when in reality, the plaintiff was 21st. We liken this case to Philippou v. J.P. Morgan Mortgage Acquisition Corp., 113 So. 3d 975, 975 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013), where the Second District Court of Appeal reversed and remanded the trial court’s final summary judgment entered in favor of a non-party to the suit. Conclusion Because the trial court erroneously granted an award to MGIC,…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw