CHARLES J. SOTIS, APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE,
v.
DIANE J. SOTIS, APPELLEE/CROSS-APPELLANT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
In this family law appeal, the court reviewed a final judgment of dissolution of marriage involving equitable distribution of marital assets. The court affirmed most of the trial court's decisions but reversed on the issue of wife's retirement accounts, finding they should have been included in the equitable distribution calculation.
The court affirmed the trial court on all issues except the first. Regarding the retirement accounts, the court held that all three accounts (the State of Florida Retirement System account and the two BENCOR accounts) should have been included in the equitable distribution amount, and reversed and remanded for recalculation of the equitable distribution to include these accounts.
[1] A trial court errs by failing to include marital retirement accounts in equitable distribution.
[2] A trial court must identify and set apart a party's premarital personal property as non-marital property.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“We affirm as to all issues except the first. Regarding Wife's retirement accounts, one is a State of Florida Retirement System account and the other two are BENCOR retirement accounts.”
Establishes the court's scope of review and identifies the specific retirement accounts at issue.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceCharles and Diane Sotis were divorcing and the trial court issued a final judgment of dissolution with an equitable distribution order. The wife posse…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Marital Liabilities cases and more on FLexlaw
Charles Sotis (“Husband”) appeals the Final Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage and the related Order on Equitable Distribution and Other Requested Relief rendered by the trial court. Husband raises the following issues: (1) the trial court erred by finding that Diane Sotis’s (“Wife”) marital retirement accounts were minimal in value and by failing to include them in equitable distribution; (2) the trial court erred in failing to identify and set apart Husband’s premarital personal property as non-marital property and by awarding said property to Wife; and (3) the trial court erred in failing to consider whether a gift was intended by Husband to Wife in the Crystal River property and by not awarding an inequitable distribution of marital assets and liabilities. Wife filed a cross-appeal contending that the trial court erred when it awarded an unequal distribution of assets.
We affirm as to all issues except the first. Regarding Wife’s retirement accounts, one is a State of Florida Retirement System account and the other two are BENCOR retirement accounts. Wife concedes that the trial court erred in failing to include in the equitable distribution amount the State of Florida retirement account. We believe that all three accounts should have been included in the equitable distribution amount. See Bardowell v. Bardowell, 975 So.2d 628 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008). Accordingly, we reverse as to the first issue and remand for further proceedings to determine the value of these accounts, include them in the equitable distribution calculation, and adjust the equitable distribution amount accordingly.
AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED.
SAWAYA, COHEN and BERGER, JJ., concur.