METROPCS COMMUNICATIONS, INC., ET AL., APPELLANT,
v.
JORGE PORTER, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Arbitration Clause Enforceability cases and more on FLexlaw
The order under review denying arbitration is reversed for a determination after an evidentiary hearing of the threshold issue of whether the arbitration clause was contained in a binding agreement between the parties. See Travelers Ins. Co. v. Irby Constr. Co. 816 So.2d 829, 830 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Melamed, 425 So.2d 127, 129 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982); Krutchik v. Chase Bank USA N.A., 531 F.Supp.2d 1359, 1365 (S.D.Fla.2008). We express no view as to the result of any other issue which may arise from that ruling. See McKenzie Check Advance of Fla., LLC v. Betts, 112 So.3d 1176 (Fla.2013); Hancock v. AT & T, Inc., 701 F.3d 1248 (10th Cir.2012); Rampersad v. Primeco Personal Commc’ns, L.P., 2001 WL 34872572 (S.D.Fla.2001); Schafer v. AT & T Wireless Servs., Inc., 2005 WL 850459 (S.D.Ill. 2005); Briceno v. Sprint Spectrum, L.P., 911 So.2d 176, 178 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005).
Reversed and remanded.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Metropcs Commc'ns v. Porter, 273 So. 3d 1025 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018)…hones purchased using a rebate. MetroPCS moved to compel arbitration of the claim based on a provision found in its terms and conditions of service. The trial court summarily denied MetroPCS’ motion. In MetroPCS Communications, Inc. v. Porter, 114 So. 3d 348, 348 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013), this court reversed the summary denial “for a determination after an evidentiary hearing of the threshold issue of whether the arbitration clause was contained in a binding agreement between the parties.” On remand, the…
-
Metropcs Commc'ns, Inc. v. Porter, 225 So. 3d 843 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016)…te In a prior appeal, MetroPCS Communications, Inc. (“MetroPCS”) sought review of the trial court’s order denying its motion to compel arbitration. We reversed the order and remanded this cause to the trial court. Metropcs Commc’ns, Inc. v. Porter, 114 So. 3d 348 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013). In our opinion reversing and remanding, we provided express directions to the tidal court: The order under review denying arbitration is reversed for a determination after an evidentiary hearing of the threshold issue of whether…
Authorities Cited
- Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Melamed, 425 So. 2d 127 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982)
- McKENZIE Check Advance OF Fla., LLC v. Betts, 112 So. 3d 1176 (Fla. 2013)
- Paola BRICEÑO v. Sprint Spectrum, L.P., 911 So. 2d 176 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)
- Travelers Ins. Co. a/s/o Spiegel Meats, Inc. v. Irby Constr. Co., Inc., 816 So. 2d 829 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002)
- Krutchik v. Chase Bank USA, N.A., 531 F. Supp. 2d 1359 (S.D. Fla. 2008)