DERRICK J. KNIGHT, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2013-05-15
No. 3D12-2185
Before SUAREZ, ROTHENBERG and SALTER, JJ.
114 So. 3d 351 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2013) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
SUAREZ, J.

SUAREZ, J.

Affirmed. See O’Neal v. State, 54 Fla. 96, 98, 44 So. 940 (Fla.1907) (noting that “mere inaccuracies of expression” will not render verdict void where manifest intent is clear when viewing record as a whole). See also Ashley v. State, 850 So.2d 1265, 1268 n. 8 (Fla.2003) (defining scrivener’s error as clerical error distinct from erroneous judicial determination).

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Knight v. State, 159 So. 3d 943 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015)
    …So. 3d 234 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (table); Knight v. State, 41 So. 3d 907 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010) (table); Knight v. State, No. 3D 11-225, 2011 WL 781900 (Fla. 3d DCA Feb. 4, 2011); Knight v. State, 90 So. 3d 293 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012) (table); Knight v. State, 114 So. 3d 351 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013).…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw