BRADLEY G. SMITH, ESQUIRE AND SMITH, FEDDELER & SMITH, P.A., APPELLANTS,
v.
KIRK SCHRYVER, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Florida appellate court reversed denial of discovery regarding successor counsel's hours and remanded for proper valuation of former counsel's attorney's fee lien under quantum meruit principles requiring consideration of totality of circumstances.
A JCC must allow discovery of successor counsel's hours billed and consider the totality of circumstances, including time, recovery sought, skill demanded, and results obtained, when valuing a discharged attorney's fee lien under quantum meruit.
[1] In workers' compensation cases, when a discharged attorney seeks a charging lien, the judge of compensation claims must allow discovery of successor counsel's hours and c…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“In cases where the discharged attorney successfully proves entitlement to a charging lien, the JCC is required to apportion the fee between the discharged attorney and the successor attorney.”
Rosenthal, Levy & Simon, P.A. v. Scott, establishing the requirement for fee apportionment.
Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceA discharged attorney in a workers' compensation case sought to compel production of hours billed by successor counsel in connection with a lump-sum s…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Charging Lien cases and more on FLexlaw
In this workers’ compensation case, the Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC) denied Claimant’s former counsel’s motion to compel production of hours billed by Claimant’s successor counsel in working toward Claimant’s lump-sum settlement, and then valued former counsel’s attorney’s fee lien based only upon the number of former counsel’s hours at an hourly rate. The discovery would result in evidence that could be relevant to valuation of former counsel’s fee lien under Rosenthal, Levy & Simon, P.A., v. Scott, 17 So.3d 872, 876 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009) (“In cases where the discharged attorney successfully proves entitlement to a charging lien, the JCC is required to apportion the fee between the discharged attorney and the successor attorney.”), Law Office of James E. Dusek, P.A. v. T.R. Enterprises, 644 So.2d 509, 510 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994) (stating quantum meruit fee will be “the reasonable value1 of the services which he [the former attorney] performed prior to discharge”), and Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. v. Poletz, 652 So.2d 366, 368 (Fla.1995) (reversing award of quantum meruit fee calculated as straight hourly fee, and remanding for consideration of “the totality of the circumstances surrounding the professional relationship between the attorney and client,” and holding “[f]actors such as time, the recovery sought, the skill demanded, the results obtained, and the attorney-client contract itself will necessarily be relevant considerations”). Accordingly, we REVERSE the order, and REMAND for further proceedings.
WOLF, ROBERTS, and RAY, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Searcy v. Paige N. Poletz, 652 So. 2d 366 (Fla. 1995)
- Rosenthal, Levy & Simon, P.A. v. Scott, 17 So. 3d 872 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009)
- State v. Sams, 644 So. 2d 509 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993)