CHRISTOPHER WATSON, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Fla. 1st DCA | 2013-05-17
No. 1D13-1494
CLARK, MARSTILLER, and SWANSON, JJ, concur.
115 So. 3d 1021 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2013) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

It appearing that petitioner only recently sought leave to amend his motion for postconviction relief to add an additional claim, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED as premature.

CLARK, MARSTILLER, and SWANSON, JJ, concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Terone Harrison v. State, 146 So. 3d 76 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014)
    …irectly on point, which requires that a defendant be given the “opportunity to object” to the cost of defense, even where the mandatory, minimum amount is imposed. See, e.g., Colson v. State, 114 So. 3d 415, 417 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013); Sharpe v. State, 115 So. 3d 1021, 1022 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013); Youman v. State, 112 So. 3d 693, 694 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013). Accordingly, we are constrained to reverse this $100.00 cost and remand for the trial court to advise Appellant of his right to a hearing to contest the amount of t…
  • Genard Chestnut v. State, 145 So. 3d 193 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014)
    …he sentencing errors raised in the Anders brief. Specifically, in Case No. 1D13-1207, we remand for the trial court to either strike the $100 indigent legal assistance lien or to give Chestnut an opportunity to contest the lien, see Sharpe v. State, 115 So. 3d 1021, 1022 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013), Colson v. State, 114 So. 3d 415, 417 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013), and Youman v. State, 112 So. 3d 693, 694 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013); and, in Case No. 1D13-1208, we remand for entry of a written probation revocation order, see Dunklin v…
  • Boyington v. State, 125 So. 3d 327 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013)
    …ndated costs may be imposed without notice (and thus, need not be individually announced at sentencing), discretionary costs or fines must be orally pronounced at sentencing in order to com [*328] port with due process requirements. Sharpe v. State, 115 So. 3d 1021, 1022 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013); Smiley v. State, 704 So. 2d 191, 195 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997). Here, the fines and costs were assessed as part of a lump sum, which was error. As such, appellate counsel’s failure to file a rule 3.800(b)(2) motion to correct th…

Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw