BENTRUST FINANCIAL, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, PETITIONER,
v.
OCEAN AUTO CENTER, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, RESPONDENT
BENTRUST FINANCIAL, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, PETITIONER,
OCEAN AUTO CENTER, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, RESPONDENT
116 So. 3d 568
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2013)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
We conclude the trial court did not depart from the essential requirements of the law and that there is no showing of irreparable harm. The petition for certio-rari is denied.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Kendrick D. Morris v. State, 198 So. 3d 31 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015)…ict Courts of Appeal had been applying Graham to juvenile nonhomicide offenders’ sentences on a case-by-case basis. Id. (comparing Thomas v. State, 78 So. 3d 644 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011) (affirming concurrent fifty-year sentences), and Reynolds v. State, 116 So. 3d 568 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013) (affirming concurrent fifty and thirty-year sentences), with Floyd v. State, 87 So. 3d 45 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) (reversing consecutive forty-year sentences), and Adams v. State, 188 So. 3d 849 (Fla.2012) (reversing sentence requirin…
-
Marko & Magolnick, P.A. v. Berens, 165 So. 3d 24 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015)…stion, we conclude that the trial court did not err in entering the Order. Likewise, the trial court did not depart from the essential requirements of the law and there is no showing of irreparable harm. Bentrust Fin., Inc. v. Ocean Auto Ctr., Inc., 116 So. 3d 568 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013). As a result, Petitioners’ Emergency Petition for Review of Trial Court Order and Alternative Petition for Writ of Certiorari is hereby denied.…