MARIA FARACH, APPELLANT,
v.
WELLS FARGO BANK, ETC., APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2013-06-19
No. 3D12-395
Before LAGOA, SALTER and LOGUE, JJ.
116 So. 3d 570 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2013) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See, e.g., Dage v. Deutsche Bank Nat’l Trust Co., 95 So.3d 1021 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) (holding that a bank’s alleged lack of standing at the time it filed a foreclosure action did not render default judgment void); accord Phadael v. Deutsche Bank Trust Co. Ams., 83 So.3d 893 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012); see also Stratton v. 6000 Indian Creek, LLC, 95 So.3d 334, 336 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012) (recognizing that the issue of standing is an affirmative defense that can be waived).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Off. OF THE Pub. Def. v. Milena Lakicevic, 215 So. 3d 112 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017)
    …e hold that the trial court erred in denying the motion for protective order, as the confidential communication by the client to his attorney was privileged [*113] and not subject to disclosure. See § 90.502(l)(c), Fla. Stat. (2015)1R.L.R. v. State, 116 So. 3d 570 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013). Reversed and remanded. . Section 90.502(l)(c) provides: A communication between lawyer and client is "confidential” if it is not intended to be disclosed to third persons other than: 1. Those to whom disclosure is in furthera…
  • …y section 90.502 of the Florida Statutes – the statute that codifies the attorney-client privilege – neither the lawyer nor the client can be compelled to disclose the content of private communications protected by the privilege. R.L.R. v. State, 116 So. 3d 570, 573, n.4 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013). Section 90.502 provides that “[a] client has a privilege to refuse to disclose, and to prevent any other person from disclosing, the contents of confidential communications when such other person learned of the com…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw