MARIA FARACH, APPELLANT,
v.
WELLS FARGO BANK, ETC., APPELLEE
MARIA FARACH, APPELLANT,
WELLS FARGO BANK, ETC., APPELLEE
116 So. 3d 570
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2013)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed. See, e.g., Dage v. Deutsche Bank Nat’l Trust Co., 95 So.3d 1021 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) (holding that a bank’s alleged lack of standing at the time it filed a foreclosure action did not render default judgment void); accord Phadael v. Deutsche Bank Trust Co. Ams., 83 So.3d 893 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012); see also Stratton v. 6000 Indian Creek, LLC, 95 So.3d 334, 336 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012) (recognizing that the issue of standing is an affirmative defense that can be waived).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Brown v. State of Fla. & Tina Lasonya Brown v. Mark S. Inch, 304 So. 3d 243 (Fla. 2020)
-
Off. OF THE Pub. Def. v. Milena Lakicevic, 215 So. 3d 112 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017)…e hold that the trial court erred in denying the motion for protective order, as the confidential communication by the client to his attorney was privileged [*113] and not subject to disclosure. See § 90.502(l)(c), Fla. Stat. (2015)1R.L.R. v. State, 116 So. 3d 570 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013). Reversed and remanded. . Section 90.502(l)(c) provides: A communication between lawyer and client is "confidential” if it is not intended to be disclosed to third persons other than: 1. Those to whom disclosure is in furthera…
-
William Hamilton Arthur Architect, Inc. v. Schneider (Fla. 3d DCA 2022)…y section 90.502 of the Florida Statutes – the statute that codifies the attorney-client privilege – neither the lawyer nor the client can be compelled to disclose the content of private communications protected by the privilege. R.L.R. v. State, 116 So. 3d 570, 573, n.4 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013). Section 90.502 provides that “[a] client has a privilege to refuse to disclose, and to prevent any other person from disclosing, the contents of confidential communications when such other person learned of the com…
Authorities Cited
- Phadael v. Deutsche Bank Tr. Co. Americas, 83 So. 3d 893 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012)
- Dage v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Tr. Co., 95 So. 3d 1021 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012)
- Douglas D. Stratton, Stratton & Feinstein, P.A. v. 6000 Indian Creek, LLC, 95 So. 3d 334 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012)