MARIE ELENA ABUJASEN A/K/A MARIE E. ABUJASEN, ETC., APPELLANT,
v.
LOWRY DREKE, ET AL., APPELLEES
MARIE ELENA ABUJASEN A/K/A MARIE E. ABUJASEN, ETC., APPELLANT,
LOWRY DREKE, ET AL., APPELLEES
118 So. 3d 235
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2013)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 5 cases
Opinion of the Court
Maria Elena Abujasen appeals an order denying her motion to intervene, which was filed after the trial court’s entry of a final judgment of foreclosure, and after a sale of the foreclosed property. Given (1) our standard of review in this case1;(2) the general rule that intervention is not permitted post-final judgment2; and (3) the absence of a transcript of the hearing below3, we affirm the trial court’s order.
In doing so, however, we note Appellees candidly conceded, both in their brief and at oral argument, that because Appellant was a nonparty to the action, the final judgment in this case does not affect any ownership interest Appellant may have in the foreclosed property.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Charry v. In re Torres v. Gonzalez, 263 So. 3d 238 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019)…K, Associate Judge. LOGUE, J. 2 Appellant seeks review of the trial court’s order denying her motion to intervene following a hearing. We review the denial of the motion to intervene for an abuse of discretion. See Abujasen v. Dreke, 118 So. 3d 235, 235 n.1 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013) (citing Barnhill v. Fla. Microsoft Anti-Trust Litig., 905 So. 2d 195, 199 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (“The standard of review of an order on a motion to intervene is abuse of discretion.”)). Although a hearing was held on Appe…
-
LMG NW 173 DR LLC v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Tr. Co., 138 So. 3d 491 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Applegate v. Barnett Bank, 377 So. 2d 1150 (Fla.1979); Abujasen v. Dreke, 118 So. 3d 235 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013).…
Authorities Cited
- Pitcher v. Schneider (Fla. 5th DCA 2018)
- Albert v. Applegate et ux., 377 So. 2d 1150 (Fla. 1979)
- Dickinson v. Segal, 219 So. 2d 435 (Fla. 1969)
- Barnhill v. In re Florida Microsoft Antitrust Litigation, 905 So. 2d 195 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)