KAREN MARY RAPHAEL, PETITIONER,
v.
GARY WAYNE RAPHAEL, RESPONDENT

Fla. 5th DCA | 2013-05-24
No. 5D13-1304
PALMER, LAWSON and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.
118 So. 3d 834 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2013)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

A judge's hostility toward a party's counsel can be grounds for disqualification, and the motion was timely filed.


Facts & Procedural History

Petitioner sought to disqualify the judge due to alleged personal bias against her attorney, citing prior disqualifications in unrelated cases involvi…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Karen Mary Raphael seeks a writ of prohibition after the Honorable Dennis Craig denied her motion to disqualify him from further proceedings in Ms. Raphael’s dissolution of marriage case.

Ms. Raphael’s petition sets forth that there is an obvious and apparent personal bias by Judge Craig against Mr. Hartley, her attorney, that dates to well before Judge Craig took the bench. Judge Craig has previously granted two motions to disqualify in unrelated cases in which Mr. Hartley was an attorney of record. In the instant case, however, Judge Craig denied the motion to disqualify as being untimely and legally insufficient. Suffice it to say, we find that the motion was timely filed within ten days of Mr. Hartley discovering that Judge Craig was assigned to this case.

A judge’s antipathy or hostility toward a party’s counsel can provide grounds for *835disqualification. See Livingston v. State, 441 So.2d 1083, 1087 (Fla.1983); Hayslip v. Douglas, 400 So.2d 553, 556-57 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981). Here, the petition clearly sets forth that there is hostility between Judge Craig and Mr. Hartley. In light of Judge Craig’s prior orders disqualifying himself in two other cases where Mr. Hartley was an attorney of record, Judge Craig should have likewise granted Ms. Raphael’s motion to disqualify. As a result, we grant the writ of prohibition, and Judge Craig is disqualified from hearing this case.

PETITION GRANTED.

PALMER, LAWSON and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw