JASON DANIEL KIRK, PETITIONER,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By (24 total)

• Wolkoff v. Am. Home Mortg. Servicing, Inc., 153 So. 3d 280 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014)
  …nting Vent with a proposed final judgment, presumably prepared by AHMSI’s counsel. A document that was identified but never admitted into [*282] evidence as an exhibit is not competent evidence to support a judgment. Correa v. U.S. Bank Nat’l Ass’n, 118 So. 3d 952, 955 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013). To the extent that AHMSI argues that the Wolkoffs failed to preserve a challenge to the use of the proposed final judgment through contemporaneous objection, its argument is without merit. Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Anastacia S. Lacombe and Max P. Lacombe v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Tr. Co. for Long Beach Mortg. Loan Tr., 149 So. 3d 152 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014)
  …despite any deficiencies in the objections made at trial and absence of post-trial motions. Rule 1.530(e) applies to appeals challenging the sufficiency of the evidence in mortgage foreclosure actions after bench trial. See Correa v. U.S. Bank N.A., 118 So. 3d 952, 954 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013). Accordingly, Appellants’ challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence is properly before this court. We review the sufficiency of the evidence to prove standing to bring a foreclosure action de novo. Dixon v. Express Equity…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Gawker Media, LLC v. Bollea, 170 So. 3d 125 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015)
  …y to the rule. For example, in Parrish v. Dougherty, 505 So. 2d 646 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987), the appellant’s attorney appeared at the trial and participated without objecting to the manner in which it had been set. In Correa v. U.S. Bank National Ass’n, 118 So. 3d 952 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013), the appellant agreed to a rescheduled trial date, participated in the trial, and made no objection to any deviation from rule 1.440. In both instances, the appellants were deemed to have waived their assertions of error based on…