MANUEL SANTANA, PETITIONER,
v.
THE FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, RESPONDENT
MANUEL SANTANA, PETITIONER,
THE FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, RESPONDENT
118 So. 3d 962
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2013)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Consistent with the Florida Parole Commission’s concession of error, the petition for writ of certiorari is GRANTED. The circuit court’s order denying Santana’s petition for writ of mandamus is QUASHED and this matter is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with Alday v. Fla. Parole Comm’n, 58 So.3d 327 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011).
WOLF, CLARK, and RAY, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Figueroa v. Fed. Nat'l Mortg. Ass'n, 180 So. 3d 1110 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015)…ument that was identified but never admitted into evidence as an exhibit is not competent evidence to support a judgment.” Wolkoff v. Am. Home Mortg. Servicing, Inc., 153 So. 3d 280, 281-82 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014) (citing Correa v. U.S. Bank Nat’l Ass’n, 118 So. 3d 962, 965 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013)). Accordingly, Fannie Mae did not properly reestablish the lost note. [*1115] Lack of Standing A “de novo standard of review applies when reviewing whether a party has standing to bring an action.” Boyd v. Wells Fargo Bank,…
-
Seidler v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 179 So. 3d 416 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015)…he bare affirmations by Wells Fargo’s only witness were insufficient to prove Wachovia’s, and thus Wells Fargo’s, entitlement to reestablish' a lost note and then enforce that note under sections 673.3011 and 673.3091. See Correa v. U.S. Bank, N.A., 118 So. 3d 962 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) (testimony of employee of mortgage servicer insufficient to prove circumstances of loss of note); Shores v, First Florida Resource Corp., 267 So. 2d 696 (Fla. 2d DCA 1972) (bare affirmation of corporate officers insufficient to es…
Authorities Cited
- Alday v. Fla. Parole Comm'n, 58 So. 3d 327 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011)