PHILIP PANCOAST, PETITIONER,
v.
MICHAEL D. CREWS, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RESPONDENT
PHILIP PANCOAST, PETITIONER,
MICHAEL D. CREWS, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RESPONDENT
119 So. 3d 468
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2013)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
DISMISSED. See Baker v. State, 878 So.2d 1236 (Fla.2004). Petitioner is cautioned that the filing of any further unauthorized petitions with this court challenging his Pinellas County convictions and sentences may result in the imposition of sanctions against him.
CLARK, MARSTILLER, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Pancoast v. Crews, 128 So. 3d 815 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013)…ons were denied with citations to Baker v. State, 878 So. 2d 1236 (Fla.2004) (reiterating that ha-beas corpus cannot be used to litigate issues that could have been or were raised on direct appeal or in postconviction motions). In Pancoast v. Crews, 119 So. 3d 468 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013), petitioner was warned that any further unauthorized petitions filed in this court challenging his Pinellas County convictions may result in the imposition of sanctions against him. Although petitioner has attempted to circumvent…
Authorities Cited
- Baker v. State, 878 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 2004)