GREGORY CARPENTER, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 2013-08-30
No. 5D12-2637
TORPY, C.J., PALMER and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.
120 So. 3d 618 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2013) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Jones v. State, 963 So.2d 180, 185 (Fla.2007) (holding that admissibility of evidence is within trial court’s discretion and its ruling will not be reversed unless clear abuse of that discretion is shown).

TORPY, C.J., PALMER and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Churchill v. State, 169 So. 3d 1260 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015)
    …l court’s ruling on his pre-trial motion in limine.1 We [*1261] decline to address the issue. Because the trial court’s order was not dispositive,2 it cannot be challenged on direct appeal. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A)©; Garcia-Roque v. State, 120 So. 3d 618 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013) (affirming defendant’s convictions and sentences without addressing lower court’s ruling on the motion in limine because such ruling was not dispositive). “An issue is legally dispositive only if, regardless of whether the appell…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw