F.R., A JUVENILE, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Fla. | 2013-09-19
No. SC12-602
POLSTON, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur., CANADY, J., concurs in result.
122 So. 3d 866 Florida Supreme Court (2013)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted review of the decision in F.R. v. State, 81 So.3d 572 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012), based on express and direct conflict. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. Upon further consideration, we have determined that we should exercise our discretion and discharge jurisdiction. Accordingly, we hereby dismiss this review proceeding.

It is so ordered.

POLSTON, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur.

CANADY, J., concurs in result.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw