GREGORY ROWE, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 2013-10-16
No. 4D13-2187
TAYLOR, LEVINE and FORST, JJ., concur.
124 So. 3d 962 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2013) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Ajfimed. See Sherwood v. State, 745 So.2d 378 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999).

TAYLOR, LEVINE and FORST, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Lieberman v. Lieberman, 160 So. 3d 73 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014)
    …alf of the client.” R. Regulating Fla. Bar 4-3.7(a) (emphasis added). The rule does not support general disqualification of counsel. “Disqualification of a party’s chosen counsel is a drastic remedy that should be used sparingly.” Caruso v. Knight, 124 So. 3d 962, 963-64 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013). In addition, “[mjotions for disqualification are generally viewed with skepticism because disqualification of counsel impinges on a party’s right to employ a lawyer of choice, and such motions are often interposed for ta…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw