GLENN ALAN DAVIDOW, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• O'Flaherty-Lewis v. State, 230 So. 3d 15 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017)
  …evidence, the trial court must make two determinations: (1) whether-the evidence is relevant or material to some aspect of the offense being tried, and (2) whether the probative value is substantially outweighed by any prejudice.” Ricketts v. State, 125 So. 3d 194, 195 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (quoting Santiago v. State, 70 So. 3d 720, 725 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011)). The Williams rule evidence in this 'case was relevant to prove the state of [*18] mind aspect of extortion. The crime of extortion requires that a defenda…
• Tex Cordell Foster v. State, 232 So. 3d 512 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017)
  …dmissible when relevant to prove a material fact in issue, including, but not limited to, proof of motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake or accident.” § 90.404(2)(a); see, e.g., Ricketts v. State, 125 So. 3d 194, 195-96 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (“Because knowledge is a specific element of [trafficking in cannabis], the evidence of the other crates was admissible Williams rule evidence because it was ‘relevant or material to some aspect of the offense being tried…

Authorities Cited

• Rico Emmanuel Sloss v. State, 925 So. 2d 419 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006)