LEON JACKSON, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2008-12-17
No. 3D06-2190
Per Curiam
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2008)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

Florida appellate court affirmed burglary and theft conviction but reversed sentence because trial court erroneously believed violent career criminal sentencing was mandatory rather than discretionary.


Holding

A trial court's violent career criminal sentence must be reversed when the court mistakenly believed sentencing as a violent career criminal was mandatory rather than discretionary.


Headnotes

[1] A trial court abuses its discretion by imposing a violent career criminal sentence when the court mistakenly believes such sentencing is mandatory rather than discretiona…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“Well, the problem that you have is because you're a violent career criminal, a GORT, the law says I've got to sentence you to a 30-year minimum/mandatory. There's nothing I can do.”

Trial court's sentencing statement showing erroneous belief that violent career criminal sentencing was mandatory

Facts & Procedural History

Jackson was convicted by jury of burglary of a dwelling and petit theft. The trial court sentenced him as a violent career criminal to forty years wit…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Leon Jackson’s conviction but reverse his sentence. After the jury found Jackson guilty of burglary of a dwelling and petit theft, the trial court held a sentencing hearing and stated: “Well, the problem that you have is because you’re a violent career criminal, a GORT, the law says I’ve got to sentence you to a 30-year minimum/mandatory. There’s nothing I can do.”

The court then sentenced Jackson as a violent career criminal under section 775.084(l)(d), Florida Statutes (2003), and imposed a sentence, on count one, of forty years in state prison with a thirty-year mandatory minimum; and on count two, to credit for time served.

As in Calderon v. State, 745 So.2d 535, 536 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999), the record shows that the trial court mistakenly believed that a violent career criminal sentence was mandatory. See State v. Harris, 718 So.2d 933, 934 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998) (stating that “[t]he statute calls for the trial court to impose sentence as a violent career criminal unless ‘the court finds ... that it is not necessary for the protection of the public ... ’ ”). The quoted language from the sentencing hearing transcript reflects that the trial court believed it had no choice but to sentence Jackson as a violent career criminal to a minimum mandatory sentence of thirty years.

We therefore affirm Jackson’s conviction, but reverse and remand for resen-tencing.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw