THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT(S)/PETITIONER(S),
v.
RIGOBERTO FERNANDEZ, APPELLEE(S)/RESPONDENT(S)
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT(S)/PETITIONER(S),
RIGOBERTO FERNANDEZ, APPELLEE(S)/RESPONDENT(S)
127 So. 3d 527
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2010)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 10 cases
Opinion of the Court
This Court’s order of December 2, 2010, is hereby vacated. The appellee’s motion for rehearing is granted on the authority of State v. Cable, 51 So.3d 434 (Fla. 2010). The order granting the appellee’s motion to suppress is affirmed also on the authority of Cable.
SUAREZ, ROTHENBERG and SALTER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Dirico v. Redland Ests., Inc., 154 So. 3d 355 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014)…retation.” Penzer v. Transp. Ins. Co., 29 So. 3d 1000, 1005 (Fla. 2010). But “[a] true ambiguity does not exist [in a contract] merely because [the] contract can possibly be interpreted in more than one manner.” BKD Twenty-One Mgmt. Co. v. Delsordo, 127 So. 3d 527, 530 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012). “[I]n the absence of some ambiguity, the intent of the parties to a written contract must be ascertained from the words used in the contract, without resort to extrinsic evidence.” Real Estate Value Co., Inc. v. Carnival Co…
-
Citimortgage, Inc. v. Turner, 172 So. 3d 502 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015)…asonable interpretation, but “where one interpretation of a contract would be absurd and another would be consistent with reason and probability, the contract should be interpreted in the rational manner.” BKD Twenty-One Mgmt. Co., Inc. v. Delsordo, 127 So. 3d 527, 530 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012). [*505] Here, the language of the mortgage unambiguously provides that it covers the entire Gulfview Lane property, including the 1/2 interest in the property held by Loper. First, the property subject to the mortgage is des…
-
Frederick J.C. Vyfvinkel v. Vyfvinkel, 135 So. 3d 384 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014)…paragraph) the 2013 alimony payment would be $4,200.00 ($4,000.00 + [$4,000.00 x (3% +2%)]). Given the arguments made on appeal,2 this is the only reasonable reading of the quoted language. As explained in BED Twenty-One Management Co. v. Delsordo, 127 So. 3d 527 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012): “[a] true ambiguity does not exist [in a contract] merely because [the] contract can possibly be interpreted in more than one manner. Indeed, fanciful, inconsistent, and absurd interpretations of plain language are always possi…
Previewing 3 of 10 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- State v. Cable, 51 So. 3d 434 (Fla. 2010)