DENNIS COX, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 2012-11-14
No. 4D11-1393
MAY, C.J., TAYLOR and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.
127 So. 3d 561 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2012) Negative Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that giving the standard jury instruction on attempted manslaughter was not fundamental error in a prosecution for attempted first degree murder where the defendant was convicted of attempted second degree murder.


Facts & Procedural History

The defendant was convicted of robbery with a firearm and attempted second degree murder with a firearm. He appealed, arguing the trial court committe…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant appeals his conviction and sentence for robbery with a firearm and attempted second degree murder with a firearm. He raises four issues on appeal, none of which we find has merit. However, in his fourth issue, the defendant argues the trial court committed fundamental error in giving the standard jury instruction on attempted manslaughter. We disagree and affirm. See Williams v. State, 40 So.3d 72, 73 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010), rev. granted, 64 So.3d 1262 (Fla.2011).

In Williams, we held that the giving of the standard jury instruction on attempted manslaughter was not fundamental error in a prosecution for attempted first degree murder in which the defendant was convicted of the lesser included offense of attempted second degree murder. All the other districts have held contrary to Williams. See Houston v. State, 87 So.3d 1, 4 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011); Burrows v. State, 62 So.3d 1258, 1259 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011); Lamb v. State, 18 So.3d 734, 735 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009); Burton v. State, 125 So.3d 788, at 789 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011).

The parties agree Williams is controlling in this district until our supreme court resolves the conflict. We affirm, but certify conflict with the other districts on this issue. See Coriolan v. State, 77 So.3d 840, 840 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012).

Affirmed. Conflict certified.

MAY, C.J., TAYLOR and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • COX v. State, 132 So. 3d 956 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014)
    …On Remand from the Supreme Court PER CURIAM. The supreme court having quashed this court’s decision in Cox v. State, 127 So. 3d 561 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012), we reverse appellant’s conviction on the ground that the jury instruction for attempted voluntary manslaughter was fundamentally erroneous under Williams v. State, 123 So. 3d 23 (Fla.2013). Reversed and remanded for a new tr…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw