L.J.G.-C., APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 2013-11-22
No. 2D12-3481
KHOUZAM and SLEET, JJ., Concur.
127 So. 3d 720 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2013)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

L.J.G.-C. appealed his disposition order in a juvenile delinquency case for damaging church property. While the court's adjudication of delinquency was affirmed, the disposition order was reversed because the State failed to prove damages exceeded $200 (required for a third-degree felony), requiring remand for a disposition based on the lesser misdemeanor charge and a corrected order form.


Holding

The adjudication of delinquency is affirmed, but the disposition order is reversed and remanded because the State failed to establish the $200 threshold for the felony charge. On remand, the court must enter a new disposition based on a finding of second-degree misdemeanor criminal mischief for damage of $200 or less, using the proper Form 8.947.


Headnotes

[1] A conviction for third-degree felony criminal mischief requires proof that the damage to property exceeded $200.

[2] A disposition order in a juvenile delinquency proceeding must be consistent with the applicable Florida Rules of Juvenile Procedure forms.

Previewing 2 of 5 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“it failed to prove that the damage to the property was "greater than $200," as required to establish this third-degree felony delinquent act”

Establishes the critical evidentiary failure by the State that justified reversing the disposition

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

L.J.G.-C. damaged a statue at a church in December 2011. The State filed a delinquency petition alleging third-degree felony criminal mischief under s…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
ALTENBERND, Judge.

ALTENBERND, Judge.

L.J.G.-C. appeals his disposition order in this juvenile delinquency proceeding. L.J.G.-C. received a withheld adjudication of delinquency and a term of juvenile probation. The State concedes an error in the disposition. In addition, the disposition order is not consistent with Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure Form 8.947.

L.J.G.-C. damaged a statue at a church in December 2011. The State filed a petition for delinquency alleging that the juvenile had committed third-degree felony criminal mischief under section 806.13(2), Florida Statutes (2011). At the adjudicatory hearing in this case, the State established that L.J.G.-C. had damaged the statue but it failed to prove that the damage to the property was “greater than $200,” as required to establish this third-degree felony delinquent act. See § 806.13(2). The court found that L.J.G.C. had committed this delinquent act. It withheld adjudication, placing L.J.G.-C. on probation. The State concedes that the felony amount of damages was not established. As acknowledged by the State, this case must be remanded for a disposition that is based on a finding that the juvenile committed a delinquent act by violating section 806.13(l)(b)(l) as a result of his damage to property in the amount of “$200 or less,” which is a second-degree misdemeanor. Thus, the error in this case affects both the description of the delinquent act in the disposition order and the term of probation.

We note that the disposition order on appeal in this ease is unusual. It is not consistent with Form 8.947. In fact, it bears little resemblance to Form 8.947 and it contains numerous handwritten entries that are difficult to decipher. It is at least possible that this order was intended to be a courtroom draft document that would be replaced with a standard order. On remand, when the court corrects this disposition order it shall do so on a form consistent with Form 8.947.1

The determination that L.J.G.-C. committed a delinquent act is affirmed. The *722disposition order is reversed for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

KHOUZAM and SLEET, JJ., Concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw