MICAH LAMB, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 2013-12-05
No. 1D13-4430
WOLF, VAN NORTWICK, and CLARK, JJ., concur.
127 So. 3d 898 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2013) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. All pending motions are denied.

WOLF, VAN NORTWICK, and CLARK, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Wright v. State, 161 So. 3d 442 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014)
    …when the state relies on and repeatedly emphasizes the statement in closing argument and the defense attempts to show the statement was coerced, id. at 434-35, the confession is “by far” the most damaging evidence presented at trial, Horne v. State, 127 So. 3d 898, 905 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013), the confession presents the whole picture of the crime and is “highly inculpatory and prejudicial,” Deviney v. State, 112 So. 3d 57, 79 (Fla.2013), or the confession is the only direct evidence that the defendant was the pe…
  • Smith v. State, 261 So. 3d 714 (Fla. 5th DCA 2018)

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw