ARTHUR R. ERLACHER, APPELLANT,

v.

LEONARD BROTHERS TRANSFER, A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Berne v. Peterson, 113 So. 2d 718 (Fla. 3d DCA 1959)
  …sportation is for the mutual benefit of both the driver and his passenger, or for the sole benefit of the driver. Sproule v. Nelson, Fla.1955, 81 So. 2d 478; Sullivan v. Stock, Fla.App.1957, 98 So. 2d 507; Miller v. Morse Auto Rentals, Fla.App.1958, 106 So. 2d 204; Montana v. Gorp, Fla.App.1959, 108 So. 2d 64. However, it is also clear that the guest statute does apply when the motivating purpose of the transportation is “companionship, pleasure, social amenities, hospitality, and the like.” Sullivan v. Stock…
• Raydel, Ltd. v. Medcalfe, 162 So. 2d 910 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964)
  …tiff was not a guest because the use of the automobile constituted a part of the consideration given by Mrs. Soper in return for the services of Mrs. Medcalfe. Peery v. Mershon, 149 Fla. 351, 5 So. 2d 694; Miller v. Morse Auto Rentals, Fla.App.1958, 106 So. 2d 204. Cf. Brown v. Killinger, Fla.App.1962, 146 So. 2d 124. It was established by the deposition of Mrs. Soper that she agreed to let the Medcalfes use the Ford car in a continuation of her husband’s arrangement. Her testimony shows that the agreement wa…
• Jeanett Brown v. Killinger, 146 So. 2d 124 (Fla. 1st DCA 1962)
  …or his services if he does act. Restatement of the Law, Agency 2d, § 16a. The liability of an agent for his own torts is so well recognized as to require no discussion. In the leading Florida case (Miller v. Morse Auto Rentals, Inc. (Fla.App.1958), 106 So. 2d 204) plaintiff Miller was a pastry cook for a Mrs. Tjelios who owned the Malayan Lounge. On the morning of the accident plaintiff discovered she needed certain ingredients in order to proceed with her work and so informed Mrs. Tjelios by phone. It was a…

  ← 1 / 2 →

Authorities Cited

• Erlacher v. Leonard Bros. Transfer, 106 So. 2d 201 (Fla. 2d DCA 1958)