EDDIE BROWN, APPELLANT(S)/PETITIONER(S),

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE(S)/RESPONDENT(S)

Citator

Cited By

• Dawnmarie Loftis v. Loftis, 208 So. 3d 824 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017)
  …idence is inadvertently omitted from cases where a party seeks “to reopen its case, change the evidence to alter the existing facts, and then adduce proof of the new facts as altered by using the evidence of such changes”). Nor does Byrne v. Byrne, 128 So. 3d 2 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012), support Former Wife’s position. In Byrne, the wife’s motion to reopen was not opposed by the husband, nor was there any discussion of prejudice. 128 So. 3d at 6. Here, Former Husband opposed the motion, arguing that it would be p…
• Green v. Green, 126 So. 3d 1112 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012)
  …inancial situations of the parties be ascertained and compared, and the need of one party for additional support and the ability of the other to pay it, be determined.”). Our holding finds support in the Third District’s decision in Byrne v. Byrne, 128 So. 3d 2 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012). In Byrne, the Third District held that the permanent alimony award was improper. Id. at 5. In reaching its holding, the court reasoned that section 61.08(2)(d) mandates that the trial court make findings regarding distribution of…
• Edwards v. Jeffrey Rosen, M.D., 189 So. 3d 177 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016)
  …la. 4th DCA 1981). But “Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.530(a) enables a trial court to evaluate matters that it did not consider prior to. judgment, and to correct any error if the trial court becomes convinced that it has erred.” Byrne v. Byrne, 128 So. 3d 2, 7 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012). “The showing necessary to overturn the denial of a motion for new trial is not as great as that necessary to Overturn an order granting such a motion.” Manhardt v. Tamton, 832 So. 2d 129, 131 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002). A trial court…