JEREMIAH HIGGINS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 2014-01-03
No. 1D12-4995
ROBERTS and CLARK, JJ., concur., THOMAS, J., dissents with opinion.
128 So. 3d 983 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2014) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS and CLARK, JJ., concur.

THOMAS, J., dissents with opinion.

THOMAS, J.

Dissenting.

I respectfully dissent. The admission of the collateral-crime evidence here constituted fundamental error. Everett v. State, 124 So.3d 938 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013). I would reverse for a new trial.

Dissent
THOMAS, J.

THOMAS, J.

Dissenting.

I respectfully dissent. The admission of the collateral-crime evidence here constituted fundamental error. Everett v. State, 124 So. 3d 938 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013). I would reverse for a new trial.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Reynaldo Antonio Aviles v. State, 165 So. 3d 841 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015)
    …(Fla. 2d DCA 2013). Reasonable efforts to comply with a condition of probation cannot be •deemed a willful violation. Odom. Furthermore, a written order revoking probation must conform to the trial court’s oral [*843] pronouncement. Crews v. State, 128 So. 3d 983 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014); Fletcher v. State, 149 So. 3d 147 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014). Appellant raises three challenges to the revocation of probation. He first argues that the trial court erred in basing revocation, in part, on his failure to maintain full-…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw