LESLIE BROS., INC.,
v.
GEORGE W. ROOPE, ET UX.
Pursuant to a special and extraordinary-motion filed herein on April 27, 1933, following denial of appellant’s petition for rehearing under date of April 22, 1933, the Court has again completely reconsidered and reviewed this cause, and after due consideration of all matters presented, has reached the conclusion that the opinion filed' on rehearing as reported under the style of Leslie Bros., Inc., v. Roope, 108 Fla. 289, 148 Sou. Rep. 212, should be adhered to, and that the decree appealed from, as modified on rehearing, should stand affirmed as heretofore decided, and' mandate be issued accordingly. It .is so ordered.
Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Waybright v. Duval Cnty., 142 Fla. 875 (Fla. 1940)…, and no other distinguishing features in the county to which the enactment relates are suggested or conceived to justify a general rather than a local law for the smaller county on the subject regulated in' this case. In State ex rel. v. Williams, 112 Fla. 734, 150 So. 804, the classification by population covered two counties and the statutory enactment had relation not to establishing a civil service system, as in this case, but to then existing county fiscal matters, and the classification might have a…
-
State v. Harris, 120 Fla. 555 (Fla. 1934)…llows that this quo warranto must fail, annd that the present proceeding must [*570] be dismissed without prejudice to the constitutional questions involved. And it is so ordered on the authority of State, ex rel. Landis, Atty. General, v. Williams, 112 Fla. 734, 151 Sou. Rep. 284. Davis, C. J., and Terrell, J., concur in the opinion. Ellis, Brown and Buford, J. J., dissent from the opinion. Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell, Brown and Buford concur in the order entered.…
-
Denis Rety v. Green, 546 So. 2d 410 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)…is therefore patently obvious that the defendants may not now repudiate that position and launch an entirely new appeal or cross appeal from the subject order on a motion for rehearing. Leslie Bros. v. Roope, 108 Fla. 289, 148 So. 212 (Fla.), aff'd, 112 Fla. 734, 150 So. 804 (Fla. 1933); Cartee v. Florida Dept. of Health & Rehabilitative Servs., 354 So. 2d 81, 83 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977); In re Certificate of N.Y. to Compel Attendance of Witness, 297 So. 2d 865, 866 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974); Kerr v. Schildiner, 167 S…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Leslie Bros. Inc. v. Roope, 108 Fla. 289 (Fla. 1933)