EUGENE JACKSON, APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE,
v.
ATTORNEY'S TITLE INSURANCE FUND, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, CARY A. LUBETSKY AND KRINZMAN, HUSS AND LUBETSKY, LLP, APPELLEES/CROSS-APPELLANT
EUGENE JACKSON, APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE,
ATTORNEY'S TITLE INSURANCE FUND, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, CARY A. LUBETSKY AND KRINZMAN, HUSS AND LUBETSKY, LLP, APPELLEES/CROSS-APPELLANT
132 So. 3d 1191
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2014)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed. See Wolfe v. Foreman, 128 So.3d 67 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Pearson v. BH Transfer & Chartis Claims, Inc., 163 So. 3d 1280 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015)…this Court has previously held that section 440.13(3)(i) requires a. carrier to respond to a request within a specific time-frame or forfeit its right to contest the medical necessity of the requested service. Andino-Rivera v. Se. Atl. Beverage Co., 132 So. 3d 1191, 1193 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014) (“Under sections 440.13(3)(d) and (i), an employer or carrier ‘forfeits the right to contest’ the medical necessity of an authorized doctor’s referral for (additional) medical treatment, unless the employer or carrier respo…
Authorities Cited
- Wolfe v. Foreman, 128 So. 3d 67 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013)