MIAMI & NORTHERN REALTY CORP.
v.
BARNETT NATIONAL BANK OF COCOA
MIAMI & NORTHERN REALTY CORP.
BARNETT NATIONAL BANK OF COCOA
112 Fla. 745
Florida Supreme Court (1933)
Caution
Also reported at: 150 So. 804
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
This cause coming on to be heard upon the transcript of the record and the briefs and oral argument of counsel, all of which have been duly considered, the Court is of the opinion that there is no reversible error in the orders appealed from. It is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the orders appealed from in this cause be and they are hereby affirmed.
Affirmed.
Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Waybright v. Duval Cnty., 142 Fla. 875 (Fla. 1940)…distinguishing features in the county to which the enactment relates are suggested or conceived to justify a general rather than a local law for the smaller county on the subject regulated in' this case. In State ex rel. v. Williams, 112 Fla. 734, 150 So. 804, the classification by population covered two counties and the statutory enactment had relation not to establishing a civil service system, as in this case, but to then existing county fiscal matters, and the classification might have also had a’ ba…
-
Denis Rety v. Green, 546 So. 2d 410 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)…atently obvious that the defendants may not now repudiate that position and launch an entirely new appeal or cross appeal from the subject order on a motion for rehearing. Leslie Bros. v. Roope, 108 Fla. 289, 148 So. 212 (Fla.), aff'd, 112 Fla. 734, 150 So. 804 (Fla. 1933); Cartee v. Florida Dept. of Health & Rehabilitative Servs., 354 So. 2d 81, 83 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977); In re Certificate of N.Y. to Compel Attendance of Witness, 297 So. 2d 865, 866 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974); Kerr v. Schildiner, 167 So. 2d 798, 80…
-
State v. Casper, 417 So. 2d 263 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982)…ever made in the State’s brief, and it is not appropriate to raise new matters on petition for rehearing. See O’Steen v. State, 92 Fla. 1062, 111 So. 725 (1926); Leslie Bros., Inc. v. Roope, 108 Fla. 289, 148 So. 212 (1933), adhered to 112 Fla. 734, 150 So. 804. The precise issue presented by this appeal is whether the evidence in a light most favorable to the State demonstrates that, at a time when the defendant had no intention to steal the decoy’s money, the police, acting through the decoy, induced th…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence