CHARLES J. ZAUCHA AND JEANETTE DRAWDY ZAUCHA, HIS WIFE, APPELLANTS,
v.
DADE COUNTY, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1958-11-24
No. 58-644
106 So. 2d 641 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1958) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …ed that he had suffered a twenty per cent permanent partial disability. The ruling of the deputy was affirmed by the full Commission. Thereafter the employee sought review by cer-tiorari in the District Court of Appeal. That court denied certiorari. 106 So. 2d 641. From this summary of the proceeding it is clear that the employee did not receive all of the benefits which he claimed before the deputy commissioner. His efforts to [*386] change the ruling of the deputy by his appeals to the full Commission and t…
  • D.A. Netzel, Inc. v. Special Disability Tr. Fund, 681 So. 2d 874 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)
    …ive caloric intake, was a permanent physical impairment for reimbursement purposes); Curtis v. Wick Roofing Co., 3 F.C.R. 92 (I.R.C. Jan. 21, 1958) (denying reimbursement claim based on obesity being a preexisting permanent condition), cert. denied, 106 So. 2d 641 (Fla.1958). Cf. Special Disability Trust Fund v. Stone & Webster Eng’g Corp., I.R.C. Order 2-3778 (Apr. 24, 1979) (allowing reimbursement where preexisting condition was obesity, because evidence established medical cause, i.e., a psychoneurotic con…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw