SHAWN ROSS MCPHERSON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
SHAWN ROSS MCPHERSON, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
134 So. 3d 966
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2010)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
In this direct appeal from his criminal convictions, the appellant challenges the denial of a motion to suppress evidence obtained pursuant to a search warrant. Although the officers who submitted the affidavit in support of the warrant had some conversation about the case with the judge who issued the warrant, the determination of probable cause was based on the affidavit as required under decisions such as Orr v. State, 382 So.2d 860 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980). The motion to suppress was thus properly denied, and the appellant’s convictions are therefore affirmed.
VAN NORTWICK, CLARK, and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Heine v. LEE Cnty., 221 So. 3d 1254 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017)…n County, 627 So. 2d 476, 479 (Fla. 1993)). The Heines, however, conflate the Consistency Statute’s expansive conferral of standing with the scope of what a plaintiff with standing may challenge. See Martin County Conservation All. v. Martin County, 134 So. 3d 966, 967 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) (“Section 163.3215 is a remedial statute designed to enlarge the class of persons with- standing to' challenge a local development order”). Because the Consistency Statute was intended to liberalize standing, not broaden the…
Authorities Cited
- ORR v. State, 382 So. 2d 860 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980)