BETTYE BYRD, APPELLANT,
v.
AGENCY FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 2012-05-18
No. 1D11-6084
DAVIS, WETHERELL, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.
134 So. 3d 995 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2012) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Finding no error in the determination that Appellant, Bettye Byrd, was properly assigned to Tier Three of the Medicaid Developmental Disabilities Home and Community Based Services Waiver Program, we affirm the final order of the Agency for Persons with Disabilities. Because it is undisputed that Appellant did not satisfy any of the criteria set forth in section 393.0661(3)(b), Florida Statutes, and Florida Administrative Code Rule 65G-4.0028, we reject her argument that the Agency erred in not assigning her to Tier Two.

AFFIRMED.

DAVIS, WETHERELL, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Peaslee v. Perrine, 202 So. 3d 974 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016)
    …erred in not affording Appellant a meaningful opportunity to be heard before summarily denying his motion. See Bennett v. Abdo, 167 So. 3d 522, 522 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015); Carrozza v. Stowers, 153 So. 3d 340, 341 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014); Ramirez v. Teutsch, 134 So. 3d 995 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012); Goodwin v. Whitley, 103 So. 3d 932, 932 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012); Kugler v. Joosten, 58 So. 3d 323 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011); Colarusso v. Lupetin, 28 So. 3d 238, 239 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010). “ ‘[D]ue process requires that [the movant] be give…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw