CYNTHIA RICHARDSON, APPELLANT,
v.
ARAMARK/SEDGEWICK CMS, APPELLEES
CYNTHIA RICHARDSON, APPELLANT,
ARAMARK/SEDGEWICK CMS, APPELLEES
134 So. 3d 1133
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2014)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
Based ' on Castellanos v. Next Door Company, 124 So.3d 392 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013), we AFFIRM. In so doing, we certify that our disposition of the instant case passes upon the same question we certified in Castellanos. Id. at 394. We, therefore, decline to follow the Appellant’s suggestion that we certify additional questions of great public importance relating to the instant case.
ROWE, MARSTILLER, and RAY, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Castellanos v. Next Door Co., 192 So. 3d 431 (Fla. 2016)…; Gonzalez v. McDonald's, 156 So. 3d 1127 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015); Diaz v. Palmetto Gen. Hosp./Sedgwick CMS, 146 So. 3d 1288 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014); Pfeffer v. Labor Ready Se., Inc., 155 So. 3d 1155 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014); Richardson v. Aramark/Sedgewick CMS, 134 So. 3d 1133 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014). ., To name just a few of the ways in. which the workers', compensation system has become increasingly complex and difficult, if not impossible, for an injured worker to successfully navigate without the assistance of an attorne…
-
Richardson v. Aramark/Sedgwick CMS, 193 So. 3d 880 (Fla. 2016)…PER CURIAM. This case is before this Court for review of the decision of the First District Court of Appeal in Richardson v. Aramark/Sedgewick CMS, 134 So. 3d 1133, 1134 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014), affirming an attorney’s fee award of $19.44 per hour for 90 hours of work reasonably expended by the claimant’s attorney in a workers’ compensation case. The attorney’s fee was calculated in strict compliance with the conc…
Authorities Cited
- Castellanos v. Next Door Company/Amerisure Ins. Co., 124 So. 3d 392 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013)