NICHOLAS J. FREDERICK, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 2014-03-21

No. 5D12-1125

PALMER, EVANDER and BERGER, JJ., concur.

135 So. 3d 471 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (2014)

Topics

Double Jeopardy Principles Lesser Included Offense Double Jeopardy

Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Double Jeopardy Principles cases and more on FLexlaw

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Nicholas Frederick appeals the judgment and sentence entered against him after a jury found him guilty of numerous charges.1 Because the aggravated assault convictions on Counts V and VI involved the same victims as in Counts II and III and each offense occurred within the same criminal episode, we vacate the convictions on Counts V and VI based on double jeopardy principles. Fleming v. State, 75 So.3d 397, 400 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011). In all other respects, we affirm.

*472AFFIRMED, in part; VACATED, in part.

PALMER, EVANDER and BERGER, JJ., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Authorities Cited

Issac Nicholas Ray Fleming v. State, 75 So. 3d 397 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011)

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw

NICHOLAS J. FREDERICK, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Authorities Cited

NICHOLAS J. FREDERICK, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE