ANTHONY MICHAEL MIGLIACCIO, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Anthony Michael Migliaccio appeals his conviction for battery on a law enforcement officer that occurred during a forced haircut incident at a county jail. The court affirmed his conviction, finding that the evidence, including his own trial testimony, was sufficient to support the jury's verdict.
The conviction was affirmed. The jury could properly find that the deputy was engaged in the lawful performance of a legal duty and that the battery was not justified as self-defense.
[1] A jury may convict a defendant of battery on a law enforcement officer if the evidence shows the officer was engaged in the lawful performance of a legal duty and the bat…
[2] A defendant's belief that a jail rule violates his religious faith does not justify battery on a law enforcement officer enforcing that rule.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Nevertheless, the testimony at trial — even his own trial testimony alone — would be sufficient to convict him.”
Establishes the sufficiency of evidence standard and that even the appellant's own admissions supported conviction.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceOn July 10, 2012, jail deputies were escorting Migliaccio to have his hair cut as required by jail rules before transferring him to the jail annex. Mi…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Battery On A Law Enforcement Officer cases and more on FLexlaw
Anthony Michael Migliaccio [“Migliac-cio”] appeals his conviction, after a jury trial, on one of two charged counts of battery on a law enforcement officer. The charge arose out of an incident at the St. Johns county jail. Defendant has a history of mental health issues and treatment and a record of miscellaneous low-level prior offenses. At the time, he was serving a 364-day jail sentence for felony battery.1
On July 10, 2012, deputies were escorting Migliaccio to have his hair cut as required by jail rules (hair off the collar, off the ears) before moving the following day to the jail annex where sentenced inmates were housed. He did not want a haircut, however. He was offended that the barber was not a “licensed professional,” and he claimed that having this hair cut would be a violation of his particular understanding of his Catholic faith. At trial, he testified that, when he balked, as the corrections officers led him in the direction of the barber chair, one of the guards, John Hag-berg [“Hagberg”], grabbed him by the arm, and he pushed Hagberg “in self-defense” (“I grabbed him by whatever he was wearing” and I “tried to ... throw him.”) For his part, the deputy testified that although verbally defiant, Migliaccio got as far as the barber chair but then jumped up, struck him with a “double fist kind of push-punch to the chest” and ran away.
Migliaccio elected to represent himself at trial with stand-by counsel, and then he filed a pro se notice of appeal and brief. Although the brief is hard to decipher, the trial transcript shows him to be articulate and resourceful. Nevertheless, the testimony at trial — even his own trial testimony alone — would be sufficient to convict him. The jury could find that Hagberg was engaged in the lawful performance of a legal duty and that the battery was not justified.
AFFIRMED.
PALMER and COHEN, JJ., concur.