GULLIVER SCHOOLS, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, AND SCHOOL MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANTS,
v.
PATRICK SNAY, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2013-10-10
No. 3D13-1952
Before SUAREZ, SALTER and EMAS, JJ.
137 So. 3d 1031 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2013) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
SUAREZ, J.

ON MOTION TO FILE BRIEFS AND APPENDICES UNDER SEAL

SUAREZ, J.

Gulliver Schools, Inc. and School Management Systems, Inc.’s Amended Motion to File Briefs and Appendices Under Seal is facially insufficient. We. therefore deny the motion without prejudice to file a motion to seal that complies with the test for sealing of court proceedings and records set forth in Barron v. Fla. Freedom Newspapers, 531 So.2d 113 (Fla.1988). See Fla. R.J. Admin. 2.420; BDO Seidman, LLP v. Banco Espirito Santo Int% Ltd., — So.3d — (Fla. 3d DCA 2009).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Fannye Wilson v. City OF Tampa, 209 So. 3d 646 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017)
    …urther the requirements of notice and, therefore, we conclude the legislature has said what it meant and meant what it said. In accordance with the requirement that strict compliance with the statute is required, Vargas v. City of Fort Myers, [*649] 137 So. 3d 1031, 1034 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014), we hold that to strictly comply with the statutory notice demanded of section 768.28(6)(a), two express requirements must be met. First, the claim must be in writing, and second, it must assert a claim for compensation. Th…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw