JOHN C. PREVATT AND MARY L. PREVATT, HIS WIFE, APPELLANTS,
v.
RESSIE LINK, APPELLEE
JOHN C. PREVATT AND MARY L. PREVATT, HIS WIFE, APPELLANTS,
RESSIE LINK, APPELLEE
107 So. 2d 37
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1958)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
It appearing that the appellants have failed to prosecute the appeal in this cause' in accordance with the provisions of the Florida Appellate Rulés, it is, upon consideration,
Ordered by the Court sua sponte that the appeal in this cause be and the same is hereby dismissed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Dara v. State, 278 So. 2d 334 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973)…ht of these alleged errors and find them not to be well-taken and, therefore, affirm the conviction as to the appellant Harner although his appeal is subject to dismissal for failure to comply with the appellate rules. Prevatt v. Link, Fla.App.1958, 107 So. 2d 37; Ferrell Jewelers of Tampa, Inc., v. Southern Mill Creek Products Company, Inc., Fla.1967, 205 So. 2d 657; Hemmerle v. City of Wilton Manors, Fla.App.1971, 251 So. 2d 146; Rule 6.-13, F.A.R., 32 F.S.A. Turning to the appellant Dara, the only point…
-
Hemmerle v. City OF Wilton Manors, 251 So. 2d 146 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971)…appellate court has the express power under Rule 6.13, FAR, as well as the inherent power to dismiss an appeal on its own motion where the same is not properly prosecuted. See Bell v. Bell, Fla.1955, 81 So. 2d 526 and Prevatt v. Link, Fla.App.1958, 107 So. 2d 37. Indulging the presumption of correctness in favor of the ruling of the circuit court, we assume that the basis for the dismissal by that court of the petitioner’s appeal was the failure of the petitioner to bring to the circuit court, in any form,…