SAMUIEL K. MESSIHA, APPELLANT,
v.
FIRST FLORIDA CREDIT UNION, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Foreclosure Judgment cases and more on FLexlaw
Appellant, Samuiel K. Messiha, appeals the Summary Final Judgment of Foreclosure. We find no error in the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of Appellee, First Florida Credit Union. However, given Appellee’s concession that the trial court’s award of interest in the amount of $16,513.79 resulted from a miscalculation, we reverse the judgment as to the interest award and remand the case with instructions to recalculate the interest owed to Appellee and enter an amended judgment. See Freedman v. Fraser Eng’g & Testing, Inc., 927 So.2d 949, 954 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) (affirming the final judgment enforcing and foreclosing the charging lien but remanding with instructions to recalculate the amount due); B.K.T., Inc. v. S. Fla. Bank, 658 So.2d 1177, 1177 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995) (remanding the ease for correction of the monetary judgment award).
AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED with instructions.
LEWIS, C.J., THOMAS and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Elli Gutfrucht v. Fed. Nat'l Mortg. Ass'n, 235 So. 3d 967 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017)…y, we reverse the final judgment’s computation of the amount due and remand for the trial court to recalculate that sum based on the correct principal amount and enter a judgment reflecting that amount. See, e.g., Messiha v. First Fla. Credit Union, 139 So. 3d 376, 377 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014) (reversing and remanding for the recalculation of the interest awarded in a final judgment of foreclosure where amount awarded was based on a miscalculation). Affirmed in part; reversed in part; remanded with directions.…
Authorities Cited
- Johnson Moody v. State, 927 So. 2d 949 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006)
- B.K.T., Inc. v. S. Fla. Bank, 658 So. 2d 1177 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995)
- W.E. v. State, 658 So. 2d 1177 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995)