TIMOTHY DONNELL GREEN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 2014-05-29
No. 1D12-5000
LEWIS, C.J., WOLF and MAKAR, JJ., concur.
139 So. 3d 460 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2014) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

*461PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Timothy Donnell Green, who was convicted of aggravated battery with great bodily harm and with a weapon, two counts of false imprisonment, sexual battery with a firearm, and burglary of a dwelling with assault or battery, appeals his convictions and sentences and raises three issues, only one of which merits discussion. We agree with Appellant that the trial court erred by denying his motion to correct sentencing error with regard to the mandatory minimum firearm enhancement on Count 5, sexual battery with a firearm, and, therefore, reverse and remand with instructions to strike the firearm enhancement on that count. See Arnett v. State, 128 So.3d 87, 87 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013) (reversing and remanding the appellant’s sentence with directions to strike his mandatory minimum firearm enhancement sentence because a defendant’s sentence may not be enhanced pursuant to section 775.087(2), Florida Statutes, unless the defendant is charged with actually possessing a firearm, and noting that the jury’s finding of actual possession did not cure the charging defect); Green v. State, 18 So.3d 656, 656-57 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) (holding in part that the information did not charge actual possession where it alleged that the defendant “carried, displayed, used, threatened, or attempted to use any weapon or firearm”). We otherwise affirm Appellant’s convictions and sentences.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED with directions.

LEWIS, C.J., WOLF and MAKAR, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Ivory Lee Robinson v. State, 215 So. 3d 1262 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017)
    …884 So. 2d 1058 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004), and Daniel v. State, 935 So. 2d 1240 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006), as supporting per se reversible error for technical-defects in charging documents. See McKenzie v. State, 31 So. 3d 275 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010); Green v. State, 139 So. 3d 460 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014); Lewis v. State, 177 So. 3d 64 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015), However, the Florida Supreme Court’s recent opinion in Martinez v. State, No. SC15-1620, 211 So. 3d 989, 2017 WL 728098 (Fla. Feb. 23, 2017), declares technical-defects in state-…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw