DAVID MCCULLA, ET UX., PETITIONER,
v.
BRIAN C. RELL, D.P.M., ET AL., RESPONDENT

Fla. | 2014-05-29
No. SC12-2598
POLSTON, C.J., and LEWIS, CANADY, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur., PARIENTE and QUINCE, JJ., dissent.
140 So. 3d 538 Florida Supreme Court (2014) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted review of the Second District Court of Appeal’s decision in Rell v. McCulla, 101 So.3d 878 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012), based on express and direct conflict. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. Upon further consideration, we have determined that we should exercise our discretion and discharge jurisdiction. Accordingly, we hereby dismiss this review proceeding.

It is so ordered.

POLSTON, C.J., and LEWIS, CANADY, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur.

PARIENTE and QUINCE, JJ., dissent.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw