ALBERT K. HAYNES, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
ALBERT K. HAYNES, PETITIONER,
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
140 So. 3d 686
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2014)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 13 cases
Opinion of the Court
By a petition to invoke the all writs jurisdiction of this court, petitioner seeks to challenge his judgment and sentence in Alachua County Circuit court case number 01-2006-CF-000815-A. The petition is dismissed. See Williams v. State, 918 So.2d 541 (Fla.2005) (stating that the all writs provision of article V, section 3(b)(7), Florida Constitution, does not confer added appellate jurisdiction on the courts, and the court’s all writs power cannot be used as an independent basis of jurisdiction in the courts (citing St. Paul Title Ins. Corp. v. Davis, 392 So.2d 1304, 1305 (Fla.1980))).
WOLF, PADOVANO, and RAY, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (11 total)
-
Boatright v. Philip Morris USA Inc., 218 So. 3d 962 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017)…b)(1) applies to proposals for settlement. Instead, these cases either decide ancillary issues which do not address the interplay between rule 2.516(a) and 2.516(b)(1), or simply do not relate to proposals for settlement at all. See Matte v. Caplan, 140 So. 3d 686, 689-90 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014) (holding that a motion for sanctions was invalid because it did not comply with the e-mail formatting requirements in rule 2.516(b)(1)(E)); see also Floyd v. Smith, 160 So. 3d 567, 569 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015) (implying that r…
-
Wheaton v. Mardella Wheaton, 217 So. 3d 125 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017)…th the decision and analysis of our sister court in Floyd v. Smith, 160 So. 3d 567 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015) (holding that a proposal for settlement served by e-mail must comply with the email service requirements of rule 2.516). See also Matte v. Caplan, 140 So. 3d 686 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014) (affirming trial court’s denial of a motion for attorney’s fees sought as a sanction pursuant to section 57.105(4), Florida Statutes (2013), because the motion was not served in strict compliance with rule 2.516, and implicitly r…
-
Wheaton v. Mardella Wheaton, 261 So. 3d 1236 (Fla. 2019)
Previewing 3 of 11 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- ST. Paul Title Ins. Corp. v. Davis, 392 So. 2d 1304 (Fla. 1980)