ALON D. SIMS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 2014-05-28
No. 4D13-3894
CIKLIN, LEVINE and KLINGENSMITH, JJ„ concur.
141 So. 3d 613 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2014) Positive Treatment
Cited by 17 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

Alon Sims appealed the summary denial of his successive rule 3.850 motion challenging his conviction and habitual violent felony offender sentence. The Fourth District affirmed, finding his grounds either not cognizable or without merit.


Holding

The court affirmed the summary denial. Grounds one through seven regarding jury instructions were not cognizable. Grounds eight and nine lacked merit: Sims was convicted of kidnapping (a first-degree felony), not a life felony, so the habitualization challenge failed; and his prior robbery conviction was validly used as a predicate despite the youthful offender sentence because he was adjudicated guilty and imprisoned, and the conviction fell within the five-year statutory period.


Headnotes

[1] Claims of trial court error in jury instructions are not cognizable in a rule 3.850 motion.

[2] A defendant's claim that a prior conviction cannot serve as a predicate for habitual offender sentencing because it was a youthful offender sentence is without merit if t…

Previewing 2 of 5 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“despite the sentencing judge's comments about use of a firearm, Sims was charged and convicted of kidnapping [without a firearm], a first-degree felony punishable by life, see § 787.01(2), Fla. Stat. (1995), not a life felony”

Establishes why the habitualization claim for a life felony lacked merit—the conviction was for a first-degree felony, not a life felony under the statute

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Sims was convicted of kidnapping (a first-degree felony punishable by life) and sentenced as a habitual violent felony offender based on a prior robbe…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the summary denial of Sims’s untimely and successive rule 3.850 motion, raising nine grounds, the first seven of which, claiming alleged trial court error in the jury instructions, were not cognizable. Although the trial court’s order did not address the two claims of illegal sentence, both were without merit.

In ground eight, Sims challenged his habitualization for a life felony, committed at a time when section 775.084, Florida Statutes, did not provide for habitual sentences for life felonies. The claim lacked merit because, despite the sentencing judge’s comments about use of a firearm, Sims was charged and convicted of kidnapping [without a firearm], a first-degree felony punishable by life, see § 787.01(2), Fla. Stat. (1995), not a life felony.

In ground nine, Sims claimed his prior conviction for robbery could not be the predicate for his sentencing as a habitual violent felony offender because he was sentenced for it as a youthful offender. However, he was adjudicated guilty and sen*614tenced to prison for that offense. That claim was raised in his August 2005 rule 3.800(a) motion, and was denied, see, e.g., Whitfield v. Singletary, 730 So.2d 314 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999), and the denial was affirmed on appeal. Sims v. State, 957 So.2d 19 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007), rev. denied, 977 So.2d 577 (Fla.2008).

Ground nine included a claim that there was no proof of the date of Sims’s release from prison for the predicate offense to establish that the instant offenses were committed within the five-year period thereafter. However, that is a ground which had to be raised on direct appeal or, if he could show prejudice, in a timely rule 3.850 motion. See Ives v. State, 993 So.2d 117 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008); Ward v. State, 946 So.2d 33 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006). In any event, the record established that the conviction for the predicate offense itself fell within the five-year period, making proof of the release date unnecessary, see § 775.084(1)(b)2, Fla. Stat. (1995), and Sims himself personally testified to his release in March of 1995, less than a year before the instant offenses were committed.

Affirmed.

CIKLIN, LEVINE and KLINGENSMITH, JJ„ concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By (14 total)

  • Cornelio Herrera-Martinez v. State, 265 So. 3d 725 (Fla. 2d DCA 2019)
    …a. 2d DCA 2009); Steward v. State, 931 So. 2d 133 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006); Shortridge v. State, 884 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); Brown v. State, 827 So. 2d 1054 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Banaszak v. State, 579 So. 2d 867 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991); Sims v. State, 141 So. 3d 613 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014). SILBERMAN, VILLANTI, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.…
  • Everett v. State, 270 So. 3d 348 (Fla. 2d DCA 2019)
    …verett v. State, 980 So. 2d 1074 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008) (table decision); Pratte v. State, 946 So. 2d 1184 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006); Steward v. State, 931 So. 2d 133 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006); Shortridge v. State, 884 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); Sims v. State, 141 So. 3d 613 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014); Harris v. State, 789 So. 2d 1114 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001). NORTHCUTT, SALARIO, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM,JJ., Concur.…
  • Givens v. State, 273 So. 3d 958 (Fla. 2d DCA 2019)
    …2d 150 (Fla. 1983); Steward v. State, 931 So. 2d 133 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006); Fredenburgh v. State, 679 So. 2d 8 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996); State v. Richards, 639 So. 2d 680 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994); State v. Gray, 633 So. 2d 105 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994); Sims v. State, 141 So. 3d 613 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014); Stafford v. State, 584 So. 2d 138 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). KELLY, VILLANTI, and BADALAMENTI,JJ., Concur.…

Previewing 3 of 14 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw