CITY OF LAKE WORTH
v.
C. J. MCLEOD
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
This case addresses whether liens for special assessments for public improvements are of equal dignity to liens for state and county ad valorem taxes. The court held that they are not, based on statutory interpretation.
No, liens for special assessments are not of equal dignity with liens for State and county ad valorem taxes. The statutes do not clearly establish them as being of equal dignity.
“Special assessments for the improvement, hardsurfacing, paving and re-paving of any street or streets, or sidewalk or sidewalks shall be payable by the owners of the property abutting upon said street or streets assessed for said improvement at the time, and in the manner, stipulated in the' resolution providing for said improvements, and special assessments shall be and remain liens superior in dignity- to all other liens, except liens for taxes, until paid.”
This quote from Comp. Gen. Laws, Sec. 3030, establishes the statutory priority of special assessment liens relative to other liens, explicitly excepting tax liens.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe City of Lake Worth imposed liens for special assessments on properties for public improvements. The question arose whether these assessment liens …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Statutory Lien cases and more on FLexlaw
The only question presented, is .whether liens upon lands for special assessments for public-improvements that afford individual property benefits, are of equal dignity with the liens upon the same lands for State and county ad valorem taxes. Statutes regulate tax liens and priorities.
The statutes of the State provide:
“All real and-personal property shall be subject to. tax *846ation on the first day of January of each year, and this Chapter shall create a lien hpon such property for the purposes thereof superior to all others, which lien in addition to the provisions of this Chapter for the collection of taxes on personal property may be enforced .by suit in equity.” Sec. 896 (696) Comp. Gen. Laws, 1927.
“All taxes imposed pursuant to the Constitution and laws of this State shall be a first lien superior to all other liens on any property against which such taxes have been assessed which shall continue in full force and effect until discharged by payment.” Sec. 894, Comp. Gen. Laws, 1927.
“Special assessments for the improvement, hardsurfacing, paving and re-paving of any street or streets, or sidewalk or sidewalks shall be payable by the owners of the property abutting upon said street or streets assessed for said improvement at the time, and in the manner, stipulated in the' resolution providing for said improvements, and special assessments shall be and remain liens superior in dignity- to all other liens, except liens for taxes, until paid.” Sec. 3030, Comp. Gen. Laws, 1927.
Special assessments made by the City of Lake Worth “shall constitute and be a lien upon the land against which the same is made from the date of the meeting of the Commission held to hear complaints against the said assessment, which lien shall be prior and superior in dignity to all other liens thereon except liens for taxes.” Sec. 5, Art. IX, Chapter 10764, Acts of 1925, City of Lake Worth Charter Act.
Lands exempt from taxation do not include “lands sold - for taxes for the use of any counties, cities, villages, towns or school districts.” Section 897 (697), paragraph 2, Compiled General Laws, 1927. This provision indicates that State taxes are a primary charge upon property.
*847In determining the priorities of statutory liens upon lands for State and county ad valorem taxes and for municipal special assessments -for public improvements involving individual property benefits, the latter class of liens are not of equal dignity with State and county taxes unless clearly so made by a fair interpretation of the intendments of the pertinent statutes considered together. The. question is whether the statutes clearly make the liens for special assessments of equal dignity with State and county ad valorem taxes, not whether the statutes make the special assessment liens inferior to the liens of State and county ad valorem taxes. See City of Tampa v. D. Lee, and City of Miami v. D. Lee, decided at this term; Sanford v. Dial, 104 Fla. 1, 142 So. 233; Poekel v. Dowling, 108 Fla. 582, 146 So. 662.
The City of Lake Worth Charter Act provides that a special assessment as authorized by the city charter “shall Constitute and be a lien upon the land against which the saine is made * * * which lien shall he prior and superior in dignity to all other liens thereon except liens for taxes * * *.” Such statutory provision, considered with the provisions as to liens for State, county and municipal taxes, do not clearly make the liens for special assessments of equal dignity with taxes for general governmental purposes, which latter are a primary and superior charge upon the lands unless otherwise provided by statute. While the City Charter statute does not make liens for special assessments inferior “liens for taxes,” such charter Act does not make special assessment liens of equal dignity with “liens for taxes,” but as was held in considering a similar city charter provision in City of Sanford v. Dial, 104 Fla. 1, 142 So. 233, the city charter provision makes liens for special assessments superior to all other liens “except liens for taxes.” There is no provision in Section 5 of Chapter 15038, Acts *848of 1931, or in Section 5 of Article IX of Chapter 10764, Acts of 1925, the Charter Act of the City of Lake Worth, which makes special assessment liens of equal dignity with State and county ad valorem taxes.
Statutes which make liens of city special assessments of equal dignity with liens of city taxes do not necessarily make such special assessment liens of equal dignity with State and county taxes, even if it be conceded that statutes may make liens of special assessments equal in dignity to State taxation. See Sections 2 and 5, Article IX, Constitution.
Section 954, Compiled General Laws, 1927, which requires officers' who make sales of property under judicial process to pay from the proceeds of such sale “all taxes, State, county and municipal,” clearly does not reguláte priorities and does not mention special assessments.
The order overruling-the demurrer to the bill of complaint is affirmed.
Davis, C. J., and Ellis, Terrell, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Rorick v. Reconstr. Fin. Corp., 144 Fla. 539 (Fla. 1940)…has generally held that the lien for State and county taxes is superior in dignity to the lien for special assessments. City of Sanford v. Dial, 104 Fla. 1, 142 So. 233; City of Tampa v. Lee, 112 Fla. 668, 151 So. 316; City of Lake Worth v. McLeod, 112 Fla. 843, 151 So. 318, and others. We find no reason whatever to depart from the holding in these cases but they all involved liens [*542] for street improvement and do not conclude the question raised in this case. It is also true that Everglades Drainage…
-
State Adjustment Co. v. Winslow, 114 Fla. 609 (Fla. 1934)…special assessments were not [*611] of equal dignity with liens for State and county taxes under the statute. City of Sanford v. Dial, 104 Fla. 1, 142 So. 233, text 238; City of Tampa v. Lee, 112 Flá. 668, 151 So. 316; City of Lake Worth v. McLeod, 112 Fla. 843, 151 So. 318. Even if under the Florida Constitution a special or local law may make the liens of special assessments for local benefits of equal dignity with liens for State and county taxes, the special or local law here, Chapter 14396, Acts of 1…
-
Jukes v. State, 123 Fla. 260 (Fla. 1936)…aking an issue, must positively deny the material facts alleged or should plead other facts sufficient to defeat relator’s right. State, ex rel. Knott, v. Haskell, 72 Fla. 176, 72 Fla. 244, 72 So. 651; State, ex rel. Rempson, v. Smith, 105 Fla. 368, 151 So. 318. [*263] A return in confession and avoidance cannot rest on conclusion of law. It must allege in detail every fact necessary to establish the avoidance. Allegations of ultimate conclusions of fact are insufficient. State, ex rel. Patton, v. Bloxham,…
Authorities Cited
- City of Sanford v. Dial, 104 Fla. 1 (Fla. 1932)
- Poekel v. Beulah B. Dowling, 108 Fla. 582 (Fla. 1933)