LORENZO EDWARD FARNELL, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that while convictions and sentences are affirmed, a remand is necessary to correct a sentencing omission.
Lorenzo Edward Farnell appealed his drug offense convictions and sentences. He filed a motion to correct sentencing errors, which was granted, but the…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Anders V. California cases and more on FLexlaw
Lorenzo Edward Farnell appeals the convictions and sentences imposed after he entered an open no contest plea to several drug offenses in three lower tribunal cases. While the appeal was pending, he filed a rule 3.800(b) motion to correct sentencing errors, which the trial court granted. One of the errors was that he was awarded 441 days of jail time credit for each of two counts in L.T. case no. 562012CF362A, but was entitled to 443 days. The trial court entered an amended sentence for count II (which also required another correction), but omitted to enter an amended sentence for count I.
Farnell’s assistant public defender filed a motion to withdraw and supporting brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), pointing out the omission.
We affirm the convictions and the sentences, but we remand with the direction *696that the trial court enter an amended sentence for count I of L.T. case no. 562012CF362A, reflecting an award of 443 days of jail time credit.
Affirmed and Remanded with Instructions.
DAMOORGIAN, C.J., WARNER and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.