JARIUS A. MCTAGGART, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
JARIUS A. MCTAGGART, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
143 So. 3d 1059
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2014)
Caution
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
On Motion for Rehearing and/or Clarification
We grant Jarius McTaggart’s motion for rehearing and/or clarification in Case No. 14-898, withdraw the opinion issued May 28, 2014, sua sponte consolidate this matter with Case No. 14-944 and issue the following opinion instead of our prior opinion:
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Stahl, 206 So. 3d 124 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016)…r destroy it. The court’s order denies the State the ability to execute an unchallenged search warrant, effectively denying the State access to what is likely to be direct evidence establishing elements of the charged offense. Cf. State v. Crumbley, 143 So. 3d 1059, 1065-66 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014) (“This appeal involves an order that prevents the State from developing its evidence in the criminal case ,... The order not only suppresses the evidence, it seals the information so that the State can never know what evi…
-
State v. Strickling, 164 So. 3d 727 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015)…ng out that information. Mullis, 79 So. 3d at 752-53, essentially concludes that law enforcement officers are not free to use their indicia of authority to pressure or cajole the staff at medical officers to violate this statute. State v. Crumbley, 143 So. 3d 1059, 1067 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014). a. Dr. Shapiro’s testimony In this case, the oral representations made by Dr. Shapiro about Strickling did not derive, as did those in Sun and Mullis, from inquiries initiated by law enforcement officers. Nor did the offi…