DANIEL TULLOCH, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 2014-08-13
No. 4D14-1733
DAMOORGIAN, CONNER and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.
145 So. 3d 901 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2014)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s summary denial of appellant’s amended claim seven following our remand in Tulloch v. State, 86 So.3d 1155 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012). The deposition transcripts conclusively refute appellant’s claim. Appellant has attempted to raise additional claims which exceed the scope of our remand. These claims are procedurally barred and were properly denied.

Affirmed.

DAMOORGIAN, CONNER and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw