MARILYN ARMSTRONG AND SCOTT OWEN AVILES, BY AND THROUGH MARILYN ARMSTRONG, HIS NEXT FRIEND AND NATURAL GUARDIAN, APPELLANT,
v.
CHARLES M. SNOWDEN, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1958-12-30
No. 58-417
CARROLL, CHAS., C. J., HORTON, J., and BARNS, PAUL D., Associate Judge, concur.
107 So. 2d 619 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1958) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

*620PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See §§ 742.011, 742.031 and 742.10, Fla.Stat., F.S.A.; Ex parte Hayes, 25 Fla. 279, 6 So. 64; Gossett v. Ullendorff, 114 Fla. 159, 154 So. 177; Eldridge v. Eldridge, 153 Fla. 873, 16 So.2d 163; Kowalski v. Wojtkowski, 19 N.J. 247, 116 A.2d 6, 53 A.L.R.2d 556.

CARROLL, CHAS., C. J., HORTON, J., and BARNS, PAUL D., Associate Judge, concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Sanders v. Yancey, 122 So. 2d 202 (Fla. 2d DCA 1960)
    …born during wedlock but the husband or reputed father is not under the disability. We note that a question similar to the instant case was apparently presented to the Third District Court of Appeal of Florida in Armstrong v. Snowden, Fla.App. 1958, 107 So. 2d 619, 620. Although neither party cited the Armstrong case to this court, either in their briefs or on oral argument, apparently the Armstrong case adopted the interpretation of the Florida law as set forth in Kowalski v. Wojtkowski, supra. The court, in…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw